DSA Notice & Action
Version 0.3 - 1 May 2026
This draft describes how Euvyra intends to receive reports, review notices, explain moderation decisions, and handle appeals under the Digital Services Act.
Draft status
This page is a product draft for the Euvyra prototype. The final DSA process must be reviewed against the actual operator, scale, country of establishment, and product launch model.
Notice-and-action workflow
Euvyra's visible report controls are intended to create a structured notice for posts, profiles, or comments. The report should enter a moderator queue with the reported subject, reason, timestamp, reporter context, and review status.
A complete notice should let Euvyra identify the content, understand why it may be illegal or against policy, and contact the reporter if more information is needed.
What users can report
- Potentially illegal content.
- Harassment, threats, or targeted abuse.
- Non-consensual intimate content or privacy-invasive content.
- Child safety issues or any suspected minor involvement.
- Spam, scams, impersonation, malware, or platform manipulation.
- Other content that may violate the Terms or Moderation Policy.
Review process
Reports should be reviewed by a human moderator. Euvyra's first production basis does not rely on AI moderation decisions.
Moderators can dismiss a report, restrict visibility, remove content, warn a user, suspend an account, or escalate the matter where legally required.
Authority orders and legal requests
Under the DSA, competent authorities may issue orders to act against illegal content or orders to provide information where the legal requirements are met.
Euvyra should verify the authority, legal basis, scope, affected content or account, and any required response deadline before acting on such orders.
International law-enforcement requests are handled only through valid legal or recognised official channels. Euvyra does not treat informal requests, private messages, or unverifiable emails as valid legal process.
Statement of reasons
When Euvyra restricts or removes content, suspends an account, or otherwise acts on a moderation report, the affected user should receive a statement of reasons where required.
The statement should explain the content affected, the action taken, whether the decision was based on law or policy, whether automation was used, and how to appeal.
Appeals and complaints
Users should be able to appeal moderation decisions through an internal complaint system. Appeals should be reviewed by a human reviewer who was not the original decision maker where operationally possible.
Euvyra should also explain any available out-of-court dispute settlement options once the final legal operating model is known.
Transparency records
The admin compliance area is structured to support a transparency log for reports, decisions, appeals, statements of reasons, and incident records.
If Euvyra becomes subject to additional DSA reporting duties, the transparency process must be expanded before launch.
Misuse of reports
Repeatedly submitting false, abusive, or bad-faith reports may lead to limits on reporting features or account enforcement after review.
Contact point
DSA notices and moderation appeals should be routed to Euvyra@tuta.com until dedicated role mailboxes and final company contact details are approved.